- Spoiler alert: don't read if you haven't read the book first -
My view while reading 'Emma' |
In fact, I hadn't read any of Jane Austen's novels before. Of course I had seen the movies of Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice, so I was expecting some mushy lovey-dovey story, but I was pleasantly surprised. Jane Austen's books are not about mawkish love stories, but about people, about characters, about social interaction and the important place this has in ordinary life. This is especially visible in Emma. The book has a small community of strong and well-developed characters, and is all about the interaction between them - the way they influence each other, the way their projects change because of the impact others have on them. Just think about how different Harriet's year would have been if she never had met Emma, how the mere fact that Jane Fairfax exists influences Emma, setting her a standard, how Highbury life would be different if Frank Churchill wouldn't have arrived, and so on.
In a classical mawkish love story Jane Fairfax and Frank Churchill would have been the leading characters: a beautiful, sweet but poor girl, an engaging, handsome and rich boy, a nasty aunt and a secret engagement - what more do you need? It sounds almost like a Disney movie. But Austen changes the focus: Emma is the focal point, a precocious girl, thinking very highly about herself. The imperfectness of the main characters makes this a perfect book.
Emma convinced me that a good book is not made by a good story. To have a good book, you need strong, interesting characters and that's about it. When you have the characters, you just let them meet each other, let them interact and write it down. That's where you'll have the perfect book.
You can find the book here.
You can find the book here.